Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56777
Title: Classificadores não intrusivos de cargas elétricas industriais utilizando técnicas de inteligência computacional
Other Titles: Non-intrusive classifiers of industrial electric loads using computational intelligence techniques
Authors: Lacerda, Wilian Soares
Ferreira, Danton Diego
Baccarini, Lane Maria Rabelo
Keywords: Monitoramento de carga não intrusivo
Perceptron de multicamadas
Máquinas de vetores de suporte
Algoritmos de otimização
Métodos de clusterização Fuzzy
Non-intrusive load monitoring
Multilayer perceptron
Support vector machines
Optimization algorithms
Fuzzy clustering methods
Issue Date: 10-May-2023
Publisher: Universidade Federal de Lavras
Citation: DAMASCENO, D. R. F. Classificadores não intrusivos de cargas elétricas industriais utilizando técnicas de inteligência computacional. 2023. 153 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia de Sistemas e Automação)–Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2023.
Abstract: Improving energy management has required performing fundamental tasks such as monitoring electrical loads, due to the current economic situation and growing ecological trends. This work presents a method of identification and classification of five industrial loads of a automotive shock absorber production line, namely: a valve press, an oil doser, a traction test, a dynamometer and a roller. In order to collect the training data of the proposed classifiers, the loads were triggered individually and the electrical current signal data were obtained through the Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring technique. As classification methods, the following machine learning algorithms were implemented: Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) of the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and also the fuzzy clustering methods K-Means (KM), Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) and Gustafson-Kessel (GK). In order to obtain the main parameters of the MLP and SVMs, three optimization techniques were applied, namely Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Differential Evolution (DE) and the Gray Wolf Optimizer (GWO). As for the clustering methods, to determine the efficient number of clusters, the validation indices Xie-Beni Criterion (XB), Classification Entropy (CE), Partition Index (SC) and Dunn Index (DI) for each proposed method. The best classifier obtained, comparing the MLP classifiers and the SVMs, was the MLPPSO, which presented among the main performance metrics a precision of 0.9556, F1-score of 0.9478, accuracy of 0.9474 and the Kappa coefficient of 0.9345 demonstrating the effectiveness of the classifier. Regarding the clustering methods, the GK stood out, which presented precision of 0.8472, accuracy 0.8378, F1-score 0.8398 and Kappa coefficient 0.7991, these values being lower than expected, and therefore not being applicable for classification of loads.
URI: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56777
Appears in Collections:Engenharia de Sistemas e automação (Dissertações)



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons