Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42950
metadata.artigo.dc.title: | Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank |
metadata.artigo.dc.creator: | Hastie, Claire E. Mackay, Daniel F. Ho, Frederick Celis-Morales, Carlos A. Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal Niedzwiedz, Claire L. Jani, Bhautesh D. Welsh, Paul Mair, Frances S. Gray, Stuart R. O’Donnell, Catherine A. Gill, Jason M. R. Sattar, Naveed Pell, Jill P. |
metadata.artigo.dc.subject: | COVID-19 Vitamin D Ethnicity |
metadata.artigo.dc.publisher: | Elsevier |
metadata.artigo.dc.date.issued: | 2020 |
metadata.artigo.dc.identifier.citation: | HASTIE, C. E. et al. Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 4, p. 561-565, July/Aug. 2020. |
metadata.artigo.dc.description.abstract: | Background and aims COVID-19 and low levels of vitamin D appear to disproportionately affect black and minority ethnic individuals. We aimed to establish whether blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was associated with COVID-19 risk, and whether it explained the higher incidence of COVID-19 in black and South Asian people. Methods UK Biobank recruited 502,624 participants aged 37–73 years between 2006 and 2010. Baseline exposure data, including 25(OH)D concentration and ethnicity, were linked to COVID-19 test results. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between 25(OH)D and confirmed COVID-19, and the association between ethnicity and both 25(OH)D and COVID-19. Results Complete data were available for 348,598 UK Biobank participants. Of these, 449 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Vitamin D was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–0.999; p = 0.013), but not after adjustment for confounders (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.998–1.01; p = 0.208). Ethnicity was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (blacks versus whites OR = 5.32, 95% CI = 3.68–7.70, p-value<0.001; South Asians versus whites OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.65–4.25, p-value<0.001). Adjustment for 25(OH)D concentration made little difference to the magnitude of the association. Conclusions Our findings do not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection, nor that vitamin D concentration may explain ethnic differences in COVID-19 infection. |
metadata.artigo.dc.identifier.uri: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402120301156 http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42950 |
metadata.artigo.dc.language: | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | FCS - Artigos sobre Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.