Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/13761
Title: Crescimento de mudas de café sob diferentes preparos do solo e irrigação para agricultura familiar
Other Titles: Growth of coffee seedlings under different soil cultivation systems and family farming drip irrigation
Authors: Ferrarezi, Rhuanito Soranz
Deus, Fábio Ponciano de
Martins, Guilherme Alonso
Primo, Renan
Testezlaf, Roberto
Keywords: Agronomia
Coffea arabica L.
Irrigation management
Irrigação
Manejo de irrigação
Irrigação localizada
Sistemas de preparo do solo
Drip irrigation
Soil cultivation systems
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: FERRAREZI, R. S. et al. Crescimento de mudas de café sob diferentes preparos do solo e irrigação para agricultura familiar. Coffee Science, Lavras, v. 10, n. 1, p. 91 - 101, jan./mar. 2015.
Abstract: Family farming is critical for Brazilian food security and economy. However, this sector has low investment capacity, which results in low utilization of production technologies. Alternative soil cultivation systems and inexpensive drip irrigation needs to be tested for family farming. The aim of this study was to evaluate different soil cultivation systems and the use of KIFNET™ drip irrigation in the initial vegetative growth of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) ‘Catuaí’ in an Oxisol. We tested three soil cultivation systems (plowing and harrowing/CONV; subsoiling at 30 cm/SS; and scarification, fertilization at 60 cm and harrowing/TO) and two irrigation treatments (irrigated and non-irrigated). The irrigation management addressed the crop water requirements by monitoring weather conditions using an automatic weather station and calculating the ETo using the Penman-Monteith equation. There were significant differences among the soil cultivation systems and irrigation (p<0.01). Treatments with CONV soil cultivation system presented higher plant height, stem diameter, number of branches and canopy width compared to the other soil cultivation systems (13.8%, 10%, 16%, and 19.2% respectively) (p <0 01). Irrigated treatments were 12.8%, 39.7%, 34.8%, and 25.8% higher than non-irrigated ones for the same variables (p <0.01). SS and TO soil cultivation systems presented no effect at the initial development stage because of the shallow root system. The tested drip irrigation system can be a low-cost alternative for irrigation in family farming.
URI: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/13761
http://www.coffeescience.ufla.br/index.php/Coffeescience/article/view/783
Appears in Collections:Coffee Science



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons