Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42843
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Serrano, Maria Martínez | - |
dc.creator | Rodríguez, David Navalpotro | - |
dc.creator | Palop, Nuria Tormo | - |
dc.creator | Arenas, Roberto Olmos | - |
dc.creator | Córdoba, Marta Moreno | - |
dc.creator | Mochón, Maria Dolores Ocete | - |
dc.creator | Cardona, Concepción Gimeno | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-09-03T19:18:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-09-03T19:18:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SERRANO, M. M. et al. Comparison of commercial lateral flow immunoassays and ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection. Journal of Clinical Virology, [S.l.], v. 129, Aug. 2020. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653220302717 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42843 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background COVID-19 pandemic has spread worldwide since December 2019. Serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing are needed for detection of current or past infections. A wide range of commercial tests is available. However, most of them need to be validated. Study design The aim was to compare a commercial IgG and IgA ELISA (Euroimmun) with three lateral flow immunoassays (LFI): Hangzhou Alltest Biotech, Wuhan UNscience Biotechnology and Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech. Specificity was calculated with 62 available serum samples from 2018/19. The study included 152 sera from patients of which 109 were RT-PCR positive. Sensitivities for ELISA anti SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA were 81.5 % and 93.1 % and specificities 100 % and 80.6 %, respectively. LFI showed variable performances, overall results being better for Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech. Conclusions Commercial serological tests are useful for detection of antibodies in patients with COVID-19. ELISA presented better results than LFI. The results allowed to incorporate the most sensitive LFI to the daily workflow, combining with ELISA. Careful validation is encouraged before clinical laboratories start using these tests. | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | pt_BR |
dc.rights | restrictAccess | pt_BR |
dc.source | Journal of Clinical Virology | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) | pt_BR |
dc.subject | COVID-19 - Diagnosis | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Antibody detection | pt_BR |
dc.title | Comparison of commercial lateral flow immunoassays and ELISA for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | FCS - Artigos sobre Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.