Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPereira, Isabela Simões de Boucherville-
dc.creatorLima, Karen Rodrigues-
dc.creatorSilva, Raquel Cristina Teodoro da-
dc.creatorPereira, Rafaela Corrêa-
dc.creatorSilva, Sandro Fernandes da-
dc.creatorMoura, Anselmo Gomes de-
dc.creatorAbreu, Wilson César de-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-10T16:44:41Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-10T16:44:41Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.citationPEREIRA, I. S. de B. et al. Evaluation of general and sports nutritional knowledge of recreational athletes. Nutrition and Health, [S.l.], 2023. No prelo.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02601060231176316pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58760-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Nutritional knowledge is one of the factors that can lead to adopting healthy eating habits and, consequently, favoring sports performance. Aim: The study aimed to assess the nutritional knowledge and its subsections general and sports nutritional knowledge of recreational athletes. Methods: A validated, translated, and adapted 35-item questionnaire was used to assess total (TNK), general—GNK (11 questions), and sports—SNK (24 questions) nutritional knowledge. The Abridged Nutrition for Sport Knowledge Questionnaire (ANSKQ) was provided online using Google Forms. Four hundred and nine recreational athletes (male: 173, female: 236, age  =  32.4  ±  9.6 years) completed the questionnaire. Results: The mean TNK (50.7%) and GNK (62.7%) scores were classified as “average” and higher than SNK (45.2%), which was classified as “poor.” Male participants had SNK and TNK scores higher than females, but not for GNK. The youngest participants (18–24 years) had TNK, SNK, and GNK scores higher than other age groups (p < 0.05). Participants who reported previous nutritional appointments with a nutritionist had higher TNK, SNK, and GNK scores than those without it (p < 0.05). Those with “advanced” formal nutrition education (university students, graduate, or postgraduate in Nutrition) scored higher than those of groups “none” and “intermediate,” for TNK (advanced  =  69.9%, intermediate  =  52.9%, and none  =  45.0%, p < 0.0001), GNK (advanced  =  74.7%, intermediate  =  63.8%, and none  =  59.2%, p < 0.0001), and SNK, (advanced  =  67.5%, intermediate  =  48.0%, and none  =  38.5%, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Results suggest a lack of nutritional knowledge in recreational athletes, mainly those without an appointment with a registered nutritionist and formal nutritional education.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherSAGE Journalspt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceNutrition and Healthpt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of general and sports nutritional knowledge of recreational athletespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DEF - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.