Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58180
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorAlmeida, Samira Luns Hatum de-
dc.creatorSouza, Jarlyson Brunno Costa-
dc.creatorPilon, Cristiane-
dc.creatorTeixeira, Antônio Heriberto de Castro-
dc.creatorSantos, Adão Felipe dos-
dc.creatorSysskind, Morgan Nicole-
dc.creatorVellidis, George-
dc.creatorSilva, Rouverson Pereira da-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-21T19:50:32Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-21T19:50:32Z-
dc.date.issued2023-07-
dc.identifier.citationALMEIDA, S. L. H. de et al. Performance of the SAFER model in estimating peanut maturation. European Journal of Agronomy, [S.l.], v. 147, July 2023.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1161030123001120pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58180-
dc.description.abstractThe most widespread method for obtaining Peanut Maturity Index (PMI), the Hull-Scrape, is time-consuming and highly subjective, which makes its application on a large scale difficult and does not represent the variability of the production area. Seeking more accurate PMI estimates, this research uses a combination of weather and spectral data. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of the Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving (SAFER) model to calculate evapotranspiration and estimate PMI, indicating the optimal timing for crop digging. The experiment was conducted in three commercial peanut fields (A, B, and C) in Georgia, USA, in the 2020 and 2021 growing seasons. Pods were collected on different dates and classified according to maturity using the Hull-Scrape method. Weather data and PlanetScope images were used to calculate actual evapotranspiration from the SAFER model, which was correlated with the PMI collected in situ and used to generate linear regression models. Maturity in Fields A and B showed a stronger correlation with evapotranspiration estimated by SAFER (0.757 and 0.796, respectively), which led to the development of a model using data from these two fields. This model presented a relative error of 13.16% and proved to be the most suitable for estimating peanut maturity by integrating different field conditions. The SAFER model proved to be promising for estimating PMI, as it reduces the subjectivity of the traditional method by eliminating the need for a person to identify the color of pod mesocarp. Additionally, the model does not require images from the given day PMI is estimated, allowing for the estimation even in regions highly affected by the presence of clouds and shadows.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Agronomypt_BR
dc.subjectRemote sensingpt_BR
dc.subjectAgrometeorologypt_BR
dc.subjectSpectral datapt_BR
dc.subjectDigital agriculturept_BR
dc.subjectArachis hypogaea Lpt_BR
dc.titlePerformance of the SAFER model in estimating peanut maturationpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DAG - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.