Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57612
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorOliveira, Marina Martins De-
dc.creatorPereira, Carine Rodrigues-
dc.creatorOliveira, Izabela Regina Cardoso De-
dc.creatorGodfroid, Jacques-
dc.creatorLage, Andrey Pereira-
dc.creatorDorneles, Elaine Maria Seles-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-08T20:24:54Z-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T19:38:48Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-08T20:24:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-27T19:38:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, M. M. de et al. Efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, Weinheim, 2021. DOI:10.1111/tbed.14259.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.14259pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57612-
dc.description.abstractThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to recalculate the efficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains and discuss the main variables associated with controlled trials to evaluate bovine brucellosis vaccine efficacy (VE). The most commonly used vaccine strain was S19, at a dose of 1010 colony forming units (CFU), followed by RB51 at 1010 CFU. The most commonly used challenge strain was B. abortus 2308, at a dose of 107 CFU, by the intraconjunctival route. Regarding the meta-analysis, trials were grouped according to the vaccine strain and dose to recalculate protection against abortion (four groups) or infection (five groups) using pooled risk ratio (RR) and VE. Regarding protection against abortion (n = 15 trials), the S19 vaccine at 109 CFU exhibited the highest protection rate (RR = 0.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.12–0.52; VE = 75.09%, 95% CI: 48.08–88.05), followed by RB51 at 1010 CFU (RR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.16–0.61; VE = 69.25%, 95% CI: 39.48–84.38). Regarding protection against infection (n = 23 trials), only two subgroups exhibited significant protection: S19 at 109 CFU (RR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.14–0.55; VE = 72.03%, 95% CI: 57.70– 81.50) and RB51 at 1010 CFU (RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22–0.84; VE = 57.05%, 95% CI: 30.90–73.30). In conclusion, our results suggest that a dose of 109 CFU for S19 and 1010 CFU for RB51 are the most suitable for the prevention of abortion and infection caused by B. abortus.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherWiley-VCH GmbHpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceTransboundary and Emerging Diseasespt_BR
dc.subjectAbortionpt_BR
dc.subjectBovine brucellosispt_BR
dc.subjectBovine - Infectionpt_BR
dc.subjectBovine - Vaccinationpt_BR
dc.subjectAbortopt_BR
dc.subjectBrucelose bovinapt_BR
dc.subjectBovinos - Infecçãopt_BR
dc.subjectBovinos - Vacinaçãopt_BR
dc.titleEfficacy of Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine strains: a systematic review and meta-analysispt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DMV - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.