Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57271
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPereira, Carine Rodrigues-
dc.creatorOliveira, Izabela Regina Cardoso de-
dc.creatorOliveira, Luciana Faria de-
dc.creatorOliveira, Camila Stefanie Fonseca de-
dc.creatorLage, Andrey Pereira-
dc.creatorDorneles, Elaine Maria Seles-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-07T18:49:43Z-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T18:25:26Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-07T18:49:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-27T18:25:26Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationPEREIRA, C. R. et al. Accidental exposure to Brucella abortus vaccines and occupational brucellosis among veterinarians in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, [S. I.], v. 68, n. 3, p. 1363-1376, May 2021. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13797.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13797pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57271-
dc.description.abstractBrucellosis is an important occupational disease, mainly among veterinarians, because of their frequent contact with sick animals, contaminated secretions and live attenuated anti-Brucella vaccines. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of accidental exposure to S19 and RB51 vaccine strains and occupational brucellosis among veterinarians registered to administer vaccinations in Minas Gerais, Brazil, as well as to identify the risk factors associated with accidental exposure to anti-Brucella abortus vaccines. Data were collected through an online questionnaire. Three hundred and twenty-nine veterinarians were included in the analyses using stratified random sampling. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictors of accidental exposure to S19 and RB51 strains. Nearly one third of the veterinarians registered to administer bovine brucellosis vaccination in Minas Gerais, 32.83% (108/329) (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.78-38.19%), reported having been accidentally exposed to S19 or RB51 vaccine strains. The exposure factors associated with this outcome included a score of personnel protective equipment (PPE) use during work (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) and a score of knowledge about brucellosis symptoms, classified as poor (base category), intermediate (OR, 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07-0.87) or good (OR, 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.62). In addition, 4.56% (15/329) (95% CI: 2.57-7.41%) of veterinarians reported that they had brucellosis, of which 46.67% (7/15) considered that the disease was due to accidental exposure to anti-B. abortus live attenuated vaccine. The prevalence of accidental exposure to B. abortus vaccine strains among veterinarians from Minas Gerais enrolled in the control of bovine brucellosis was high. The reduced knowledge about human brucellosis symptoms and lack of appropriate PPE use were risk factors from unintentional contact with S19 and RB51 vaccine strains.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.pt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceTransboundary and Emerging Diseasespt_BR
dc.subjectRB51pt_BR
dc.subjectS19pt_BR
dc.subjectJob-relatedpt_BR
dc.subjectMalta feverpt_BR
dc.subjectVaccinept_BR
dc.subjectVacinaspt_BR
dc.subjectBrucelosept_BR
dc.subjectFebre de Maltapt_BR
dc.titleAccidental exposure to Brucella abortus vaccines and occupational brucellosis among veterinarians in Minas Gerais state, Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DMV - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.