Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56010
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorFreitas, Tainah-
dc.creatorBartelega, Lucas-
dc.creatorSantos, César-
dc.creatorDutra, Mateus Portes-
dc.creatorSarkis, Leonardo Fernandes-
dc.creatorGuimarães, Rubens José-
dc.creatorDominghetti, Anderson William-
dc.creatorZito, Pauliana Cristina-
dc.creatorFernandes, Tales Jesus-
dc.creatorGuelfi, Douglas-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T18:24:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-13T18:24:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-12-01-
dc.identifier.citationFREITAS, T. et al. Technologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization. Plants, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 1-18, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/plants11233323.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56010-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to quantify NH3-N losses from conventional, stabilized, slow-release, and controlled-release N fertilizers in a coffee field. The N fertilizers analyzed were prilled urea, prilled urea dissolved in water, ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium nitrate (AN), urea + Cu + B, urea + adhesive + CaCO3, and urea + NBPT (all with three split applications), as well as blended N fertilizer, urea + elastic resin, urea-formaldehyde, and urea + polyurethane (all applied only once). NH3-N losses (mean of two crop seasons) were statistically higher for urea + adhesive + CaCO3 (27.9% of applied N) in comparison with the other treatments. Loss from prilled urea (23.7%) was less than from urea + adhesive + CaCO3. Losses from urea + NBPT (14.5%) and urea + Cu + B (13.5%) were similar and lower than those from prilled urea. Urea dissolved in water (4.2%) had even lower losses than those treatments, and the lowest losses were observed for AS (0.6%) and AN (0.5%). For the single application fertilizers, higher losses occurred for urea + elastic resin (5.8%), blended N fertilizer (5.5%), and urea + polyurethane (5.2%); and urea-formaldehyde had a lower loss (0.5%). Except for urea + adhesive + CaCO3, all N-fertilizer technologies reduced NH3-N losses compared to prilled urea.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)pt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePlantspt_BR
dc.subjectN-fertilizerspt_BR
dc.subjectNH3 emissionpt_BR
dc.subjectUrease inhibitorspt_BR
dc.subjectSlow- and controlled-release N-fertilizerspt_BR
dc.subjectCoffea arabicapt_BR
dc.subjectSustainable agriculturept_BR
dc.titleTechnologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilizationpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DAG - Artigos publicados em periódicos



Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons