Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56010
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Freitas, Tainah | - |
dc.creator | Bartelega, Lucas | - |
dc.creator | Santos, César | - |
dc.creator | Dutra, Mateus Portes | - |
dc.creator | Sarkis, Leonardo Fernandes | - |
dc.creator | Guimarães, Rubens José | - |
dc.creator | Dominghetti, Anderson William | - |
dc.creator | Zito, Pauliana Cristina | - |
dc.creator | Fernandes, Tales Jesus | - |
dc.creator | Guelfi, Douglas | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-13T18:24:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-13T18:24:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | FREITAS, T. et al. Technologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization. Plants, [S.l.], v. 11, p. 1-18, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/plants11233323. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56010 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to quantify NH3-N losses from conventional, stabilized, slow-release, and controlled-release N fertilizers in a coffee field. The N fertilizers analyzed were prilled urea, prilled urea dissolved in water, ammonium sulfate (AS), ammonium nitrate (AN), urea + Cu + B, urea + adhesive + CaCO3, and urea + NBPT (all with three split applications), as well as blended N fertilizer, urea + elastic resin, urea-formaldehyde, and urea + polyurethane (all applied only once). NH3-N losses (mean of two crop seasons) were statistically higher for urea + adhesive + CaCO3 (27.9% of applied N) in comparison with the other treatments. Loss from prilled urea (23.7%) was less than from urea + adhesive + CaCO3. Losses from urea + NBPT (14.5%) and urea + Cu + B (13.5%) were similar and lower than those from prilled urea. Urea dissolved in water (4.2%) had even lower losses than those treatments, and the lowest losses were observed for AS (0.6%) and AN (0.5%). For the single application fertilizers, higher losses occurred for urea + elastic resin (5.8%), blended N fertilizer (5.5%), and urea + polyurethane (5.2%); and urea-formaldehyde had a lower loss (0.5%). Except for urea + adhesive + CaCO3, all N-fertilizer technologies reduced NH3-N losses compared to prilled urea. | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) | pt_BR |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights | acesso aberto | pt_BR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.source | Plants | pt_BR |
dc.subject | N-fertilizers | pt_BR |
dc.subject | NH3 emission | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Urease inhibitors | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Slow- and controlled-release N-fertilizers | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Coffea arabica | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Sustainable agriculture | pt_BR |
dc.title | Technologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | DAG - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ARTIGO_Technologies for fertilizers and management strategies of N-fertilization in coffee cropping systems to reduce ammonia losses by volatilization.pdf | 1,13 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons