Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55216
Título: Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon
Palavras-chave: Biodiversity
Carbon
Deforestation
Degradation
Logging
Biodiversidade
Carbono
Desmatamento
Exploração madeireira
Data do documento: Jun-2022
Editor: National Academy of Sciences (NAS)
Citação: NUNES, C. A. et al. Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), Washington, v. 119, n. 27, e2202310119, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.220231011.
Resumo: Human activities pose a major threat to tropical forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. Although the impacts of deforestation are well studied, multiple land-use and land-cover transitions (LULCTs) occur in tropical landscapes, and we do not know how LULCTs differ in their rates or impacts on key ecosystem components. Here, we quantified the impacts of 18 LULCTs on three ecosystem components (biodiversity, carbon, and soil), based on 18 variables collected from 310 sites in the Brazilian Amazon. Across all LULCTs, biodiversity was the most affected ecosystem component, followed by carbon stocks, but the magnitude of change differed widely among LULCTs and individual variables. Forest clearance for pasture was the most prevalent and high-impact transition, but we also identified other LULCTs with high impact but lower prevalence (e.g., forest to agriculture). Our study demonstrates the importance of considering multiple ecosystem components and LULCTs to understand the consequences of human activities in tropical landscapes.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202310119
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55216
Aparece nas coleções:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.