Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/50638
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorArjona Ramírez, Miguel-
dc.creatorBeccaro, Wesley-
dc.creatorRodríguez, Demóstenes Zegarra-
dc.creatorRosa, Renata Lopes-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-18T20:53:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-18T20:53:34Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.citationARJONA RAMÍREZ, M. et al. Differentiable Measures for Speech Spectral Modeling. IEEE Access, [S.I.], v. 10, p. 17609-17618, 2022. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3150728.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/50638-
dc.description.abstractAutoregressive models for the envelope of speech power spectral densities (PSDs) are refined by the self-supervised spectral learning machine (S3LM) provided with differentiable spectral objective functions, including the Itakura-Saito divergence (ISD), the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD), the reverse KLD (RKLD) and the log spectral distortion (LSD), which display more significant results. However, in order to assess the models more perceptually, a method is proposed based upon perturbations around perfect reconstruction analysis-synthesis configurations. In the cross-excitation analysis-synthesis assessment (CEASA) method, the residual signals generated by analysis filters of the spectral models are injected as excitation into the synthesis filters derived from the same and other models in order to be evaluated by the perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) and Itakura divergence (ID), which are averaged over a set of models obtained using the objective functions mentioned above. The results lead to a superior performance when the RKLD is used as the loss function for the estimation of the spectral models with the ISD ranking close behind. The focus of these divergences on the spectral peaks is argued and pointed as the most important factor for this behavior. Specifically, using the PESQ scores obtained with CEASA, the RKLD loss is found to improve the performance by 1.0%, 4.0% and 19.3% with respect to the open-loop analysis, the KLD and the LSD models, respectively, while the corresponding improvements for the ISD loss are 0.1%, 3.0% and 18.2%, and the RKLD models excel the ISD models by 1.0% on average. Even though the spectral measures alone are not able to unequivocally distinguish the better of the two, CEASA is shown to have enough sensitivity to distinguish their performances. In summary, the learning machine S3LM fits models for the short-term spectral envelope of speech and, for the evaluation of its performance under several differentiable loss...pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)pt_BR
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceIEEE Accesspt_BR
dc.subjectAutoregressive processespt_BR
dc.subjectMachine learning algorithmspt_BR
dc.subjectPrediction methodspt_BR
dc.subjectSelfsupervised learningpt_BR
dc.subjectSpeech analysispt_BR
dc.subjectSpectral analysispt_BR
dc.subjectProcessos autorregressivospt_BR
dc.subjectAlgoritmos de aprendizagem de máquinaspt_BR
dc.subjectMétodos de previsãopt_BR
dc.subjectAprendizado autossupervisionadopt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise de discursopt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise espectralpt_BR
dc.titleDifferentiable Measures for Speech Spectral Modelingpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCC - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_Differentiable Measures for Speech Spectral Modeling.pdf1,47 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Ferramentas do administrador