Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/50357
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorGoulart, Karine Naves de Oliveira-
dc.creatorResende, Nathalia Maria-
dc.creatorOliveira, Luciana Maria-
dc.creatorDrummond, Marcos Daniel Motta-
dc.creatorLima, Fernando Vitor-
dc.creatorFujiwara, Ricardo Toshio-
dc.creatorCouto, Bruno Pena-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-27T15:55:34Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-27T15:55:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-10-18-
dc.identifier.citationGOULART, K. N. de O. et al. Cytokine response to resistance training sessions performed after different recovery intervals. Sport Sciences for Health, [S.l.], p. 1-7, Oct. 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s11332-021-00852-6.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11332-021-00852-6pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/50357-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: this study aimed to compare the inflammatory response during resistance training (RT) sessions performed after recovery intervals of 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Methods: thirteen resistance-trained male individuals (24 ± 2 years) performed three experimental conditions, each one including two sessions with a recovery interval of 24 h, 48 h or 72 h, in a randomized order. The RT sessions consisted of five sets of 8–10 repetition maximum (RM) on squat and leg press exercises. The resistance was equal in the two sessions of each condition and repetitions were performed until concentric failure. Volume load (repetitions × resistance lifted) were compared between sessions. Blood was collected pre and immediately post each RT session, for analyses of IL-6, IL-10, IL-12/IL-23p40, IL-17, TNF-α, and IFN-y. A (2 × 3) repeated measures ANOVA compared the volume load and ratio (immediately post/pre) values of all cytokines within time and conditions (α = 0.05). Results: a significant interaction was observed for volume load, which was reduced at post-recovery interval compared to pre for 24 h condition (p = 0.014), although no differences were observed for 48 h (p = 0.231) and 72 h (p = 0.237) conditions. No significant interaction was evident for any cytokine (p > 0.05), though a significant time main effect was observed for IL-6, which was significantly higher at post-recovery interval compared to pre for all conditions. Conclusion: despite reduced volume load when a resistance protocol to failure is performed at 24 h, no significant differences were observed on the inflammatory responses. Thus, a similar inflammatory profile is evident in trained men regardless recovery interval between resistance training sessions.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherSpringerpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceSport Sciences for Healthpt_BR
dc.subjectResistance trainingpt_BR
dc.subjectCytokinespt_BR
dc.subjectInflammationpt_BR
dc.subjectConcentric failurept_BR
dc.subjectRecoverypt_BR
dc.titleCytokine response to resistance training sessions performed after different recovery intervalspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DEF - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.