Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48272
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorMammola, Stefano-
dc.creatorAmorim, Isabel R.-
dc.creatorBichuette, Maria E.-
dc.creatorBorges, Paulo A. V.-
dc.creatorCheeptham, Naowarat-
dc.creatorCooper, Steven J. B.-
dc.creatorCulver, David C.-
dc.creatorDeharveng, Louis-
dc.creatorEme, David-
dc.creatorFerreira, Rodrigo Lopes-
dc.creatorFišer, Cene-
dc.creatorFišer, Žiga-
dc.creatorFong, Daniel W.-
dc.creatorGriebler, Christian-
dc.creatorJeffery, William R.-
dc.creatorJugovic, Jure-
dc.creatorKowalko, Johanna E.-
dc.creatorLilley, Thomas M.-
dc.creatorMalard, Florian-
dc.creatorManenti, Raoul-
dc.creatorMartínez, Alejandro-
dc.creatorMeierhofer, Melissa B.-
dc.creatorNiemiller, Matthew L.-
dc.creatorPellegrini, Thais G.-
dc.creatorPipan, Tanja-
dc.creatorProtas, Meredith-
dc.creatorReboleira, Ana Sofia P. S.-
dc.creatorVenarsky, Michael P.-
dc.creatorWynne, J. Judson-
dc.creatorZagmajster, Maja-
dc.creatorCardoso, Pedro-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-28T18:59:09Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-28T18:59:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMAMMOTA, S. et al. Fundamental research questions in subterranean biology. Biological Reviews, Cambridge, v. 95, n. 6, p. 1855-1872, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/brv.12642.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12642pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48272-
dc.description.abstractFive decades ago, a landmark paper in Science titled The Cave Environment heralded caves as ideal natural experimental laboratories in which to develop and address general questions in geology, ecology, biogeography, and evolutionary biology. Although the ‘caves as laboratory’ paradigm has since been advocated by subterranean biologists, there are few examples of studies that successfully translated their results into general principles. The contemporary era of big data, modelling tools, and revolutionary advances in genetics and (meta)genomics provides an opportunity to revisit unresolved questions and challenges, as well as examine promising new avenues of research in subterranean biology. Accordingly, we have developed a roadmap to guide future research endeavours in subterranean biology by adapting a well-established methodology of ‘horizon scanning’ to identify the highest priority research questions across six subject areas. Based on the expert opinion of 30 scientists from around the globe with complementary expertise and of different academic ages, we assembled an initial list of 258 fundamental questions concentrating on macroecology and microbial ecology, adaptation, evolution, and conservation. Subsequently, through online surveys, 130 subterranean biologists with various backgrounds assisted us in reducing our list to 50 top-priority questions. These research questions are broad in scope and ready to be addressed in the next decade. We believe this exercise will stimulate research towards a deeper understanding of subterranean biology and foster hypothesis-driven studies likely to resonate broadly from the traditional boundaries of this field.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherCambridge Philosophical Societypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceBiological Reviewspt_BR
dc.subjectBiospeleologypt_BR
dc.subjectCave biologypt_BR
dc.subjectGroundwaterpt_BR
dc.subjectHorizon scanningpt_BR
dc.subjectResearch questionspt_BR
dc.subjectStygofaunapt_BR
dc.subjectTroglobiontspt_BR
dc.titleFundamental research questions in subterranean biologypt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.