Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/46398
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorDias, Camila K.-
dc.creatorStarke, Robert-
dc.creatorPylro, Victor S.-
dc.creatorMorais, Daniel K.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-27T17:26:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-27T17:26:45Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationDIAS, C. K. et al. Database limitations for studying the human gut microbiome. PeerJ Computer Science, [S. l.], v. 6, e289, 2020. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.289.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/46398-
dc.description.abstractBackground. In the last twenty years, new methodologies have made possible the gathering of large amounts of data concerning the genetic information and metabolic functions associated to the human gut microbiome. In spite of that, processing all this data available might not be the simplest of tasks, which could result in an excess of information awaiting proper annotation. This assessment intended on evaluating how well respected databases could describe a mock human gut microbiome. Methods. In this work, we critically evaluate the output of the cross–reference between the Uniprot Knowledge Base (Uniprot KB) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes Orthologs (KEGG Orthologs) or the evolutionary genealogy of genes: Nonsupervised Orthologous groups (EggNOG) databases regarding a list of species that were previously found in the human gut microbiome. Results. From a list which contemplates 131 species and 52 genera, 53 species and 40 genera had corresponding entries for KEGG Database and 82 species and 47 genera had corresponding entries for EggNOG Database. Moreover, we present the KEGG Orthologs (KOs) and EggNOG Orthologs (NOGs) entries associated to the search as their distribution over species and genera and lists of functions that appeared in many species or genera, the ‘‘core’’ functions of the human gut microbiome. We also present the relative abundance of KOs and NOGs throughout phyla and genera. Lastly, we expose a variance found between searches with different arguments on the database entries. Inferring functionality based on cross-referencing UniProt and KEGG or EggNOG can be lackluster due to the low number of annotated species in Uniprot and due to the lower number of functions affiliated to the majority of these species. Additionally, the EggNOG database showed greater performance for a cross-search with Uniprot about a mock human gut microbiome. Notwithstanding, efforts targeting cultivation, single-cell sequencing or the reconstruction of high-quality metagenomeassembled genomes (MAG) and their annotation are needed to allow the use of these databases for inferring functionality in human gut microbiome studies.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherPeerJ, Incpt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePeerJ Computer Sciencept_BR
dc.subjectHuman microbiomept_BR
dc.subjectGut microbiomept_BR
dc.subjectFunctional diversitypt_BR
dc.subjectBioinformaticspt_BR
dc.subjectComputational biologypt_BR
dc.subjectDatabasespt_BR
dc.subjectMicrobioma humanopt_BR
dc.subjectDiversidade funcionalpt_BR
dc.subjectBioinformáticapt_BR
dc.subjectBiologia computacionalpt_BR
dc.titleDatabase limitations for studying the human gut microbiomept_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_Database limitations for studying the human gut microbiome.pdf1,28 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons