Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/46359
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorDias, Mariana Borges de Castro-
dc.creatorCosta, Kátia Aparecida de Pinho-
dc.creatorSeveriano, Eduardo da Costa-
dc.creatorBilego, Ubirajara Oliveira-
dc.creatorFurtini Neto, Antonio Eduardo-
dc.creatorBrand, Simone Cristiane-
dc.creatorVilela, Lourival-
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-24T18:41:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-05-24T18:41:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-07-
dc.identifier.citationDIAS, M. B. de C. et al. Brachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop–livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybean. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, v. 158, n. 3, p. 206-217, Apr. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000532.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859620000532pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/46359-
dc.description.abstractOwing to its contribution to the maintenance of carbon stocks, soil nitrogen and nutrient cycling for subsequent crops, the integrated systems become increasingly important for agricultural conservation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of and total nutrient in Brachiaria spp. and Panicum maximum forage grasses used as mulch and soybean yields in an integrated crop–livestock system and second-crop maize succession system. The treatments consisted of the following cropping systems: Xaraes palisadegrass intercropped with soybean, Congo grass intercropped with soybean, Mombaça guinea grass intercropped with soybean, Tamani guinea grass intercropped with soybean and a soybean/maize succession system. The forage grasses were established during the soybean R6–R7 stage. Compared with Congo grass, Xaraes palisadegrass, Mombaça guinea grass and Tamani guinea grass produced more biomass and equivalent amounts of fertilizer returned to the soil and resulted in greater nutrient cycling, indicating the benefits of these grasses for use as mulch in integrated production systems. Maize had a greater C/N ratio, but the forage grasses also exhibited high potential by protecting the soil until the end of the soybean development cycle. The use of an integrated crop–livestock system combined with a forage cropping system provided greater soil nutrient cycling than the maize cropping system did, which resulted in increased soybean yields, thus contributing to the sustainability of agricultural systems.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherCambridge University Presspt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceThe Journal of Agricultural Sciencept_BR
dc.subjectForage biomasspt_BR
dc.subjectNutrient contentpt_BR
dc.subjectNutrient cyclingpt_BR
dc.subjectSustainabilitypt_BR
dc.subjectBiomassa forrageirapt_BR
dc.subjectIntegração lavoura-pecuáriapt_BR
dc.subjectSucessão de culturaspt_BR
dc.subjectMilhopt_BR
dc.subjectSojapt_BR
dc.subjectCiclo de nutrientespt_BR
dc.titleBrachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop–livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybeanpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.