Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43337
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorLima, Renan C.-
dc.creatorTeixeira, Pablo H.-
dc.creatorSouza, Ari F. F.-
dc.creatorPaula Júnior, Trazilbo J.-
dc.creatorTeixeira, Hudson-
dc.creatorLehner, Miller S.-
dc.creatorCarneiro, José E. S.-
dc.creatorMarçal, Tiago S.-
dc.creatorVieira, Rogerio F.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-06T21:33:05Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-06T21:33:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationLIMA, R. C. et al. Strategy to identify resistance to white mould associated with high yield for irrigated common bean in Brazil. Plant Pathology, [S.I.], v. 69, n. 6, p. 1172-1184, Aug. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13181.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.13181pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43337-
dc.description.abstractDevelopment of common bean cultivars with partial white mould resistance through breeding techniques has been a challenge in Brazil. As yet, lines/cultivars from breeding programmes have not been investigated for resistance; therefore, this study screened 107 lines/cultivars for their reactions to white mould in 14 preliminary trials conducted under irrigation. Thirteen resistant lines/cultivars (three of Andean origin) and six Mesoamerican cultivars (three intermediately resistant and three susceptible) were selected for further investigation. These lines/cultivars and the resistant control A195 were evaluated in six advanced trials and two straw tests to assess the effectiveness of the screening procedure. In 11 preliminary trials, screenings were performed under moderate/high or higher disease pressure. These pressures occurred in two advanced trials in which, when yields were averaged across moderate/high and high pressures, 10 Mesoamerican lines/cultivars selected for resistance yielded 14%, 23%, and 38% more than intermediately resistant cultivars, A195, and susceptible cultivars, with median disease ratings (1–9 scale) of 4.5, 5.7, 5.7, and 6.7, respectively. In the straw test, three Andean lines/cultivars (A195 included) and two susceptible cultivars in the field were among those with the highest levels of physiological resistance. Thus, field rating under high disease pressure and greenhouse rating did not correlate significantly, suggesting that field trials are critical to evaluating resistance and to identifying high‐yielding beans. Therefore, lines/cultivars from breeding programmes assessed in field trials may provide a low cost and fast way to identify high‐yielding bean cultivars with partial resistance to white mould in the subtropical southern hemisphere.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherBritish Society for Plant Pathologypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourcePlant Pathologypt_BR
dc.subjectDry beanpt_BR
dc.subjectEscape mechanismspt_BR
dc.subjectGenetic resistancept_BR
dc.subjectPhaseolus vulgarispt_BR
dc.subjectSclerotinia stem rotpt_BR
dc.subjectFeijão - Doenças e pragaspt_BR
dc.subjectFeijão - Produtividadept_BR
dc.subjectResistência genéticapt_BR
dc.subjectMofo-brancopt_BR
dc.titleStrategy to identify resistance to white mould associated with high yield for irrigated common bean in Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.