Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/40750
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Silva, Bárbara Pereira Christofaro | - |
dc.creator | Silva, Marx Leandro Naves | - |
dc.creator | Avalos, Fábio Arnaldo Pomar | - |
dc.creator | Menezes, Michele Duarte de | - |
dc.creator | Curi, Nilton | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-09T00:10:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-05-09T00:10:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | SILVA, B. P. C. et al. Digital soil mapping including additional point sampling in Posses ecosystem services pilot watershed, southeastern Brazil. Scientific Reports, [S.l.], v. 9, 2019. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-50376-w | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/40750 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to evaluate the performance of three spatial association models used in digital soil mapping and the effects of additional point sampling in a steep-slope watershed (1,200 ha). A soil survey was carried out and 74 soil profiles were analyzed. The tested models were: Multinomial logistic regression (MLR), C5 decision tree (C5-DT) and Random forest (RF). In order to reduce the effects of an imbalanced dataset on the accuracy of the tested models, additional sampling retrieved by photointerpretation was necessary. Accuracy assessment was based on aggregated data from a proportional 5-fold cross-validation procedure. Extrapolation assessment was based on the multivariate environmental similarity surface (MESS). The RF model including additional sampling (RF*) showed the best performance among the tested models (overall accuracy = 49%, kappa index = 0.33). The RF* allowed to link soil mapping units (SMU) and, in the case of less-common soil classes in the watershed, to set specific conditions of occurrence on the space of terrain-attributes. MESS analysis showed reliable outputs for 82.5% of the watershed. SMU distribution across the watershed was: Typic Rhodudult (56%), Typic Hapludult* (13%), Typic Dystrudept (10%), Typic Endoaquent + Fluventic Dystrudept (10%), Typic Hapludult (9.5%) and Rhodic Hapludox + Typic Hapludox (2%). | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.rights | restrictAccess | pt_BR |
dc.source | Scientific Reports | pt_BR |
dc.title | Digital soil mapping including additional point sampling in Posses ecosystem services pilot watershed, southeastern Brazil | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.