Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38765
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Ferreira, Lívia G. | - |
dc.creator | Anastácio, Lucilene R. | - |
dc.creator | Lima, Agnaldo S. | - |
dc.creator | Correia, Maria I. T. D. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-01-30T11:55:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-01-30T11:55:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | FERREIRA, L. G. et al. Assessment of nutritional status of patients waiting for liver transplantation. Clinical Transplantation, [S.l.], v. 25, n. 2, p. 248-254, Mar./Apr. 2011. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01228.x | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38765 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Patients with advanced liver disease have several risk factors to develop nutritional deficiencies. Accurate nutritional assessment is a real challenge because many of the traditionally measured parameters of nutritional status vary with severity of liver disease independently of nutritional status. The objective of this study was to compare different tools used to assess the nutritional status of patients waiting for a liver transplant. Patients were nutritionally assessed by SGA, anthropometry, handgrip dynamometry and biochemical tests. Clinical variables were cross analyzed with the nutritional assessment methods. There were 159 patients followed. Malnutrition ranged from 6.3% to 80.8% according to the different methods used. Agreement among all the methods was low (K < 0.26). Malnutrition prevalence according to different nutritional assessment tools did not differ among this group of patients in relation to the etiology of liver disease (p > 0.05) but increased with the more advanced stages of disease according to the Child‐Pugh score. Only SGA showed significant relationships with clinical variables (Child‐Pugh scores, p < 0.05; presence of ascites and/or edema, p < 0.01; and encephalopathy, p < 0.01). The various methods used showed great variability of results, lack agreement among them, and only SGA showed correlation with the progression of liver disease. | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Wiley | pt_BR |
dc.rights | restrictAccess | pt_BR |
dc.source | Clinical Transplantation | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Liver diseases | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Liver transplantation | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Malnutrition | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Nutritional assessment | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Nutritional status | pt_BR |
dc.title | Assessment of nutritional status of patients waiting for liver transplantation | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
Appears in Collections: | DNU - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.