Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38014
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Balestre, Marcio | - |
dc.creator | Souza, João Cândido de | - |
dc.creator | Von Pinho, Renzo Garcia | - |
dc.creator | Oliveira, Rogério Lunezzo de | - |
dc.creator | Paes, José Mauro Valente | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-06T09:55:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-06T09:55:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | BALESTRE, M.; SOUZA, J. C. de; VON PINHO, R. G.; OLIVEIRA, R. L. de; PAES, J. M. V. Yield stability and adaptability of maize hybrids based on GGE biplot analysis characteristics. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, [S, l.], v. 9, p. 219-228, 2009. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.sbmp.org.br/cbab/siscbab/uploads/c8eb9791-1c9f-e792.pdf | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38014 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The objective of this study was to evaluate stability and adaptability of the grain yield of commercial intervarietal maize hybrids by the GGE (Genotype and Genotype by Environment Interaction) biplot and AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) analyses. Two intervarietal hybrids (BIO 2 and BIO4) were evaluated together with single, double and three-way cross hybrids. The performance of the intervarietal hybrid BIO 4 was superior to all double and three-way cross hybrids and outmatched the single-cross hybrids by 43%. In terms of stability, BIO 2 was more stable than BIO4, which is desirable, but biological stability, which is not necessarily desirable, was also observed, since the yield was below the environmental mean. The graphical GGE biplot analysis was superior to the AMMI1 since a greater portion of the sum of squares of GE and G+GE was captured and the predictive accuracy was higher. On the other hand, the AMMI2 graph outperformed the GGE biplot in predictive accuracy and explanation of G + GE and GE, although the difference in accuracy was smaller than between GGE2 and AMMI1. | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Brazilian Society of Plant Breeding | pt_BR |
dc.rights | restrictAccess | pt_BR |
dc.source | Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Intervarietal hybrids | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Maize - Genetic Improvement | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Híbridos intervarietais | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Milho - Melhoramento Genético | pt_BR |
dc.title | Yield stability and adaptability of maize hybrids based on GGE biplot analysis characteristics | pt_BR |
dc.title.alternative | Estabilidade e adaptabilidade produtiva de híbridos de milho utilizando a análise GGE biplot | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
dc.description.resumo | O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a estabilidade e adaptabilidade da produtividade de grãos de híbridos intervarietais de milho, em relação a cultivares híbridas comerciais utilizando-se a metodologia GGE biplot e AMMI. Foram avaliados dois híbridos intervarietais (BIO 2 e BIO4), juntamente com híbridos simples, duplos e triplos. O híbrido intervarietal BIO 4 apresentou melhor desempenho que todos os híbridos triplos, duplos e foi superior a 43% dos híbridos simples. Quanto à estabilidade, o híbrido BIO 2 foi mais estável que o híbrido BIO4, porém, apresentou estabilidade biológica, pois obteve produtividade abaixo da média ambiental. O método gráfico GGE biplot foi superior ao gráfico AMMI1, pois captou maior porção do soma de quadrados de GE e G+GE e obteve maior acurácia preditiva. Por outro lado, o gráfico AMMI2 foi superior ao GGE biplot em acurácia preditiva e explicação de G+GE e GE, porém diferença de acurácia foi menor quando comparada à acurácia do GGE2 em relação ao AMMI1. | pt_BR |
Appears in Collections: | DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.