Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37808
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCarvalho, Stephan M.-
dc.creatorBelzunces, Luc P.-
dc.creatorCarvalho, Geraldo A.-
dc.creatorBrunet, Jean Luc-
dc.creatorBeneteau, Alexandra Badiou-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-28T13:17:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-28T13:17:56Z-
dc.date.issued2013-09-
dc.identifier.citationCARVALHO, S. M. et al. Enzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: a case study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 9, p. 2117-2124, Sept. 2013.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.2288pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37808-
dc.description.abstractThe present study was intended to evaluate the responses of enzymes in the honeybee Apis mellifera after exposure to deltamethrin, fipronil, and spinosad and their use as biomarkers. After determination of the median lethal doses (LD50), honeybees were exposed at doses of 5.07 ng/bee and 2.53 ng/bee for deltamethrin, 0.58 ng/bee and 0.29 ng/bee for fipronil, and 4.71 ng/bee and 2.36 ng/bee for spinosad (equivalent to 1/10th [LD50/10] and 1/20th [LD50/20] of the LD50, respectively). The responses of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), carboxylesterases (CaEs‐1–3), glutathione‐S‐transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were assessed. The results showed that deltamethrin, fipronil, and spinosad modulated these biomarkers differentially. For the enzyme involved in the defense against oxidative stress, fipronil and spinosad induced CAT activity. For the remaining enzymes, 3 response profiles were identified. First, exposure to deltamethrin induced slight effects and modulated only CaE‐1 and CaE‐2, with opposite effects. Second, spinosad exhibited an induction profile for most of the biomarkers, except AChE. Third, fipronil did not modulate AChE, CaE‐2, or GST, increased CAT and CaE‐1, and decreased ALP. Thus, this set of honeybee biomarkers appears to be a promising tool to evaluate environmental and honeybee health, and it could generate fingerprints to characterize exposures to pesticides.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherSociety of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistrypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistrypt_BR
dc.subjectHoneybeept_BR
dc.subjectInsecticidept_BR
dc.subjectBiomarkerpt_BR
dc.subjectSublethal effectpt_BR
dc.titleEnzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: a case study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticidespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DEN - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.