Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37808
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.creator | Carvalho, Stephan M. | - |
dc.creator | Belzunces, Luc P. | - |
dc.creator | Carvalho, Geraldo A. | - |
dc.creator | Brunet, Jean Luc | - |
dc.creator | Beneteau, Alexandra Badiou | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-28T13:17:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-28T13:17:56Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | CARVALHO, S. M. et al. Enzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: a case study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticides. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 9, p. 2117-2124, Sept. 2013. | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | https://setac.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.2288 | pt_BR |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/37808 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present study was intended to evaluate the responses of enzymes in the honeybee Apis mellifera after exposure to deltamethrin, fipronil, and spinosad and their use as biomarkers. After determination of the median lethal doses (LD50), honeybees were exposed at doses of 5.07 ng/bee and 2.53 ng/bee for deltamethrin, 0.58 ng/bee and 0.29 ng/bee for fipronil, and 4.71 ng/bee and 2.36 ng/bee for spinosad (equivalent to 1/10th [LD50/10] and 1/20th [LD50/20] of the LD50, respectively). The responses of acetylcholinesterase (AChE), carboxylesterases (CaEs‐1–3), glutathione‐S‐transferase (GST), catalase (CAT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were assessed. The results showed that deltamethrin, fipronil, and spinosad modulated these biomarkers differentially. For the enzyme involved in the defense against oxidative stress, fipronil and spinosad induced CAT activity. For the remaining enzymes, 3 response profiles were identified. First, exposure to deltamethrin induced slight effects and modulated only CaE‐1 and CaE‐2, with opposite effects. Second, spinosad exhibited an induction profile for most of the biomarkers, except AChE. Third, fipronil did not modulate AChE, CaE‐2, or GST, increased CAT and CaE‐1, and decreased ALP. Thus, this set of honeybee biomarkers appears to be a promising tool to evaluate environmental and honeybee health, and it could generate fingerprints to characterize exposures to pesticides. | pt_BR |
dc.language | en_US | pt_BR |
dc.publisher | Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | pt_BR |
dc.rights | restrictAccess | pt_BR |
dc.source | Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Honeybee | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Insecticide | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Biomarker | pt_BR |
dc.subject | Sublethal effect | pt_BR |
dc.title | Enzymatic biomarkers as tools to assess environmental quality: a case study of exposure of the honeybee Apis mellifera to insecticides | pt_BR |
dc.type | Artigo | pt_BR |
Aparece nas coleções: | DEN - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.