Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/28819
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorSantos, Jessé Valentim dos-
dc.creatorVarón-López, Maryeimy-
dc.creatorSoares, Cláudio Roberto Fonsêca Sousa-
dc.creatorLeal, Patrícia Lopes-
dc.creatorSiqueira, José Oswaldo-
dc.creatorMoreira, Fatima Maria de Souza-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-08T16:30:49Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-08T16:30:49Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationSANTOS, J. V. dos et al. Biological attributes of rehabilitated soils contaminated with heavy metals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, [S. l.], v. 23, n. 7, p. 6735-6748, Apr. 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-015-5904-6pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/28819-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of two rehabilitation systems in sites contaminated by Zn, Cu, Pb, and Cd on biological soil attributes [microbial biomass carbon (Cmic), basal and induced respiration, enzymatic activities, microorganism plate count, and bacterial and fungal community diversity and structure by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)]. These systems (S1 and S2) consisted of excavation (trenching) and replacement of contaminated soil by uncontaminated soil in rows with Eucalyptus camaldulensis planting (S1-R and S2-R), free of understory vegetation (S1-BR), or completely covered by Brachiaria decumbens (S2-BR) in between rows. A contaminated, non-rehabilitated (NR) site and two contamination-free sites [Cerrado (C) and pasture (P)] were used as controls. Cmic, densities of bacteria and actinobacteria, and enzymatic activities (β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, and urease) were significantly higher in the rehabilitated sites of system 2 (S2-R and S2-BR). However, even under high heavy metal contents (S1-R), the rehabilitation with eucalyptus was also effective. DGGE analysis revealed similarity in the diversity and structure of bacteria and fungi communities between rehabilitated sites and C site (uncontaminated). Principal component analysis showed clustering of rehabilitated sites (S2-R and S2-BR) with contamination-free sites, and S1-R was intermediate between the most and least contaminated sites, demonstrating that the soil replacement and revegetation improved the biological condition of the soil. The attributes that most explained these clustering were bacterial density, acid phosphatase, β-glucosidase, fungal and actinobacterial densities, Cmic, and induced respiration.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherSpringerpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchpt_BR
dc.subjectSoil pollutionpt_BR
dc.subjectHeavy metalspt_BR
dc.subjectPhytoremediationpt_BR
dc.subjectMicrobial biomasspt_BR
dc.subjectMicrobial enzymespt_BR
dc.subjectSolos – Poluiçãopt_BR
dc.subjectMetais pesadospt_BR
dc.subjectFitorremediaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectBiomassa microbianapt_BR
dc.subjectEnzimas microbianaspt_BR
dc.titleBiological attributes of rehabilitated soils contaminated with heavy metalspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.